Reform of Financing and Management of Roads
Introduction
Roads form the backbone of social and economic activities. Roads provide
access to markets, education, and health services and normally carry between
60 and 90% of all passenger and freight transport. Therefore, economic
development is closely related to the extension and condition of the road
network. Generally, roads are the biggest public capital asset, representing
between 15% and 30% of Gross National Product (GDP) of a country.
In spite of their importance, most roads in developing countries are poorly
financed and managed. Consequently, between 30% and 50% of roads in developing
countries are in poor conditions, costing the national economy between 2 and
5% of GDP annually. Mainly, these costs are the result of increased vehicle
operating costs, longer travel times, higher accident rates, more freight
damages and additional road rehabilitation cost.
The
alarming neglect of the roads in developing countries has been analyzed and
documented in the World Bank Policy Paper
Road
Deterioration in Developing Countries: Causes and Remedies in 1988. The poor financing of road maintenance
by the public budgeting procedures and the poor management by the public road
administrations has been identified as principle causes of the deterioration
of roads in developing countries.
Based on these findings and recommendations
the World Bank together with other international and bilateral donors started
the Road Management Initiative in Africa and the GTZ started a similar Regional
Reform Program in Latin America and the Caribbean in close cooperation
with the United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America and the
Caribbean (ECLAC), the International Road Federation (IRF), the Pan American
Institute of Highways (PIH), the World Bank, the Inter-American Development
Bank (IDB), and the Organization of American States (OAS).
The new concept was to improve effectiveness
and efficiency in the road sector by promoting competition or
commercialization: bring roads into the market place, put them on a
fee-for-service basis, and manage them like a business. Two books provide a
detailed description of the concept and principles involved: Roads – A New
Concept for Road Network Management and Conservation and Commercial Management
and Financing of Roads.
The main principals of the new concept are:
Road Funds
Road
Funds are not new in the road sector. The have been created in developed as
well as in developing countries mainly to finance the development of new road
networks. They were financed by earmarking taxes for the road sector and were
administered by public road administrations. Especially in developing
countries these funds proved to be neither effective nor efficient the
political interference and the bureaucratic rules and regulations of the
public sector administrations.
Therefore,
new “second generation” road fund have been created with certain autonomy,
financed by road user charges and controlled by a mixed board with public and
private sector participation.
The basic
principles of such funds are:
Many
of these new road funds have been created in developing countries in Africa,
Latin America, Asia, and in some developed countries like in New Zealand. Not
all of these funds are strictly following the principles mentioned above. But
the closer they follow the principles the better is their effectiveness and
efficiency. The Road Fund in New Zealand seems to be one of the best-managed
road funds worldwide. The experiences with road funds in Latin America are
described in Road
Funds in Latin America
.
For a comprehensive compilation of literature
and presentations on road funds worldwide, click on Road
Funds. Some literature and presentations are in Spanish.
Performance-based
Road Management and Maintenance Contracts
The main
reason for introducing Performance-based Road Management and Maintenance
Contracts (PBC) is to increase efficiency in executing road maintenance. The
traditional way of contracting out road maintenance is based on the amount of
work being measured and paid for on agreed rates for different work items,
giving the contractor little incentives for efficiency. By contrast, PBCs
define minimum conditions of road, bridge, and traffic assets that have to be
met by the contractor, as well as other services such as the collection and
management of asset inventory data, call-out and attendance to emergencies,
and response to public requests, complaints and feedback. Payments are based
on how well the contractor manages to comply with the performance standards
defined in the contract, and not on the amount of works and services executed.
PBCs are defining the standards the roads have to be kept in and it is up to
the contractor how to achieve this. Therefore, work-selection, design and
delivery are all his responsibility. Hence, the choice and application of
technology and the pursuit of innovative materials, processes and management
are all up to the contractor. This allocates higher risk to the contractor
compared to traditional contract arrangements, but at the same time opens up
opportunities to increase his margins where improved efficiencies and
effectiveness of design, process, technology or management are able to reduce
the cost of achieving the specified performance standards. Cutting Costs and
Improving Quality through Performance-Based Road Management and Maintenance
Contracts - The Latin American and OECD Experiences – provides an excellent
overview of the history, principles, and experiences of PBCs worldwide.
For a comprehensive compilation of literature and presentations on
performance-based road management and maintenance contracts worldwide, click
on Performance-Based
Road Management and Maintenance. Some literature and presentations are in
Spanish.
In
addition to the issues of road funds and performance-based road management and
maintenance contracts, the CD contains some important literature that deals
with the reform of the road sector as such. For the compilation of this
literature please go to Road
Sector Reform.